The Veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disability from various abdominal surgeries and procedures. The claim was remanded due to the need for an independent medical opinion, as substantial compliance with the January 2020 remand has not been achieved.
The deciding factor: The Board found that substantial compliance with the January 2020 remand instructions had not been met and thus the case is being remanded for a new independent medical opinion under 38 U.S.C. § 5109.
- Claimed conditions
- abdominal deformity, psychological problems
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 19, 2021
- Citation
- 21003114
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21003114.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prostate cancer is granted as service connected due to in-service radiation exposure.,Residuals of prostate cancer, including erectile dysfunction, sterility, and urinary problems are also granted as service connected.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions regarding his claimed conditions.,Service connection is presumed based on exposure to burn pits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for TDIU was remanded due to the need for VA examinations and the need to obtain SSA records. The case is now back with the Board for further action.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board found that the Veteran's ruptured appendix, abdominal hernia, scars, and abdominal deformity are caused by VA's failure to timely diagnose and treat his appendicitis in 2002 or 2005. The event was not reasonably foreseeable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.