Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus, but has remanded the claims for diabetes and CAD due to a lack of in-service exposure to herbicide agents.

The deciding factor: The Veteran reported noise exposure during active duty which may be related to his current tinnitus. For diabetes and CAD, new evidence submitted by the Veteran suggests possible exposure to herbicides during service but this was not verified.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, diabetes mellitus type II (diabetes), coronary artery disease (CAD)
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Gulf War
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 28, 2021
Citation
21004760

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21004760.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.