The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with a previous remand, and requested an addendum opinion on whether any currently diagnosed psychiatric disability was caused by or incurred in service.
The deciding factor: The remand is required because there was not substantial compliance with the September 2020 Board remand regarding the need for a nexus opinion on whether any currently diagnosed psychiatric disability was caused by or incurred in service.
- Claimed conditions
- adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features, unspecified mood disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 28, 2021
- Citation
- 21005002
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21005002.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the March 2025 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and remands the case to allow for a new medical determination considering all relevant evidence, including the Veteran's conditions and functional ability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a pre-decisional error in failing to obtain an adequate VA medical opinion addressing the nature and etiology of the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder. The AOJ must request that the Veteran be scheduled for an examination to determine the probable nature and etiology of his diagnosed acquired psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for somatic symptom disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, memory loss, and unspecified mood disorder but denied initial compensable ratings for vitreal floaters, chronic headaches, bilateral hearing loss, and persistent cough.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of unspecified mood disorder with generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, and alcohol use disorder to correct a duty to assist error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.