The Veteran died from severe coronary artery disease. The Appellant filed a claim for DIC benefits on May 4, 2015, which was granted with an effective date of May 4, 2014. There is no evidence prior to the Veteran's death that he intended to file a claim for service connection related to Agent Orange exposure.
The deciding factor: The Veteran did not file any claims or submit an Intent to File a claim prior to his death and there was no indication of interest in claiming service connection for disabilities related to service, including those potentially linked to Agent Orange exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- Severe coronary artery disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2021
- Citation
- 21006558
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21006558.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability is found to have aggravated his non-service connected heart condition, contributing to his death. Service connection for the cause of his death is granted.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused by VA health care, and denied his claim for dependency and indemnity compensation under section 1151 of the U.S. Code.
- Denied
The Board found that the cause of death, ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe coronary artery disease, was not related to service. The veteran's cardiovascular issues were first noted six years after his retirement from active duty.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.