The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection for neurologic signs or symptoms, palindromic rheumatism of the lower and upper extremities, and cardiovascular condition due to an undiagnosed illness.
The deciding factor: The Veteran requested withdrawal of his appeal through his attorney in writing, indicating satisfaction with the granted benefits and withdrawing all appeals related to these issues.
- Claimed conditions
- neurologic signs or symptoms, palindromic rheumatism of the lower extremities, palindromic rheumatism of the upper extremities, cardiovascular condition
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2021
- Citation
- 21006695
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21006695.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
Your appeal has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. No rating decision was made on any of your claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and a need for further investigation into toxic exposure risk activities.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted a 10 percent rating for hypopigmented macules and denied service connection for hypercholesterolemia, while remanding several other claims for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for a cardiovascular condition and a lung condition to have the AOJ undertake development to attempt to corroborate the Veteran's contentions regarding his purported exposure to toxic herbicide agents while in service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.