The Veteran's residuals of renal cell carcinoma are related to his exposure to herbicide agents during service in Vietnam, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
The deciding factor: The evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran’s residuals of renal cell carcinoma are related to his service due to exposure to herbicide agents, including Agent Orange.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of renal cell carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 18, 2021
- Citation
- 21008877
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21008877.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of renal cell carcinoma, finding an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence indicating that the condition was incurred in service due to exposure to herbicides like Agent Orange.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's renal cell carcinoma and his military service, specifically exposure to herbicide agents. The VA is instructed to obtain an addendum opinion from a medical expert to address whether the Veteran's condition is related to his presumed exposure to Agent Orange during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for residuals of renal cell carcinoma due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error, requiring a VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examinations and private treatment records are inadequate for adjudication purposes. Therefore, the claims of entitlement to initial compensable ratings for residuals of renal cell carcinoma and left kidney removal, as well as TDIU, are being remanded to obtain missing records and conduct additional evaluations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.