Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim to reopen the previously denied claim for service connection for a left knee disorder is granted. The claims of service connection for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), diabetes mellitus, bilateral peripheral neuropathy, joint and muscle pain, cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is remanded. The claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, bilateral peripheral neuropathy, joint and muscle pain, cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus is remanded. The claims of service connection for bilateral peripheral neuropathy, joint and muscle pain, cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral peripheral neuropathy is remanded. The claims of service connection for joint and muscle pain, cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for joint and muscle pain is remanded. The claims of service connection for cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for cardiovascular disorder is remanded. The claims of service connection for fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for fatigue and sleep disturbances is remanded. The claims of service connection for multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages is remanded. The claims of service connection for neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a neuropsychological disorder is remanded. The claims of service connection for bilateral cataracts, and sleep apnea are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral cataracts is remanded. The claim of service connection for sleep apnea is also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea is remanded.

The deciding factor: The claims are being remanded because new and material evidence has been received, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim that the Veteran’s left knee disorder is related to his period of service.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for service connection for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL).,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for diabetes mellitus.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for bilateral peripheral neuropathy.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for joint and muscle pain.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for cardiovascular disorder.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for fatigue and sleep disturbances.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for neuropsychological disorder.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for bilateral cataracts.,The claims are being remanded because additional evidence received since the May 2007 rating decision relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for sleep apnea.

Claimed conditions
left knee disorder, non-Hodgins lymphoma (NHL), diabetes mellitus, bilateral peripheral neuropathy, joint and muscle pain, cardiovascular disorder, fatigue and sleep disturbances, multiple cerebral micro-hemorrhages, neuropsychological disorder, bilateral cataracts, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 25, 2021
Citation
21010773

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21010773.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.