The Veteran's right eye disorder was granted service connection as a direct result of an in-service injury, but the evidence did not support a nexus between his current condition and service.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not support a causal relationship between the Veteran's in-service injury and his current diagnosis of pseudophakia.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 1, 2021
- Citation
- 21011227
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21011227.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to insufficient evidence showing that his right eye disorder was caused by or aggravated by VA treatment, including the December 2015 YAG capsulotomy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete findings in previous VA examinations and a need for further clarification of certain medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for right eye disorder, spine disorder, neurological disorders of upper and lower extremities, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction due to inadequate VA examinations that did not address the Veteran's lay statements and service treatment records.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's PTSD, right eye disorder, and lumbar spine disability were denied. The claim for a TDIU was granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.