Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided that the case should be returned to the AOJ for further development regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicides while stationed at U-Tapao Royal Thai Air Force Base.

The deciding factor: There is a reasonable possibility that additional information on the Veteran’s duties and proximity to the base perimeter or contact with C-123 aircraft would substantiate the Appellant's claim for service connection for cause of death.

Claimed conditions
Cause of death
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 2, 2021
Citation
21011798

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21011798.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.