The Veteran's altered mental status and unspecified speech and thought process issues are claimed to be due to a May 2011 VA right total knee replacement surgery. The Board has determined that the claim requires further examination as there is insufficient evidence in the record.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because the Veteran’s condition prior to and after the May 2011 VA surgery needs to be evaluated, along with whether the additional disability resulted from carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
- Claimed conditions
- altered mental status, unspecified speech and thought process issues
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2021
- Citation
- 21015159
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21015159.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's pension award for aid and attendance is granted with an effective date of May 10, 2017 due to his stroke preventing him from filing a claim.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Wellington Regional Medical Center from October 20, 2012 to October 24, 2012 are granted for emergency treatment due to a nonservice-connected condition. The claim is not related to service connection and the decision does not address any exposure basis or rating assigned.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's surviving spouse was granted death pension with aid and attendance benefits starting from January 8, 2018, due to her income being below the maximum annual pension rate.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's medical services at Naples Community Hospital from February 25, 2010 to March 5, 2010 were not authorized in advance and the Board found that he was stable for transfer to a VA facility on February 25, 2010. As such, reimbursement was denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.