The Veteran's lung disability, diagnosed as benign pulmonary nodules, was not shown in service or for many years thereafter and is not otherwise related to active duty service, to include as due to presumed in-service herbicide exposure.,The Veteran’s arthritis disability, diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, was not shown in service or for many years thereafter and is not otherwise related to active duty service, to include as due to presumed in-service herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's benign pulmonary nodules began during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or disease, to include herbicide exposure.,The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran’s arthritis disability began during service or is otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or disease, to include herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- lung disability, arthritis disability
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 27, 2021
- Citation
- 21025153
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21025153.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error, specifically regarding private medical records related to asbestos exposure and lung disability. The Veteran is requested to provide information about his private physician and for VA to obtain relevant records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II; a heart disability; hypertension; and a lung disability due to insufficient evidence. The Veteran is currently diagnosed with these conditions and reported symptoms during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for compensation benefits for a lung disability and TDIU are being remanded due to errors in the initial adjudication process.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for gout and lung disability have been remanded due to the submission of new evidence that tends to prove or disprove an element at issue. The AOJ will now consider these claims on their merits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.