Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer as secondary to prostatitis with prostate hypertrophy is dismissed.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen the claims of service connection for a neurologic disability, to include radiculopathy of the left upper extremity, as secondary to degenerative changes of the cervical spine.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen the claims of service connection for a neurologic disability, to include radiculopathy of the bilateral lower extremities as secondary to degenerative changes of the lumbar spine.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for hypertension.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding prostate cancer. The RO denied this claim in an August 2003 rating decision, which became final after a year without appeal or new and material evidence.,New and material evidence has been received to support the claims of service connection for radiculopathy of the left upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities as secondary to degenerative changes of the cervical spine and lumbar spine respectively. The Board found that these conditions are proximately due to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.,New and material evidence has been received to support the claims of service connection for radiculopathy of the left upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities as secondary to degenerative changes of the cervical spine and lumbar spine respectively. The Board found that these conditions are proximately due to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.,New and material evidence has been received to support the claim of service connection for hypertension. The Board found that this condition is related to the Veteran's service-connected prostatitis with prostate hypertrophy.

Claimed conditions
prostate cancer, peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity, radiculopathy of the bilateral lower extremities, hypertension
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 11, 2021
Citation
21028422

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21028422.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.