The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a new VA examination and retrospective medical opinion to address the severity of his right elbow disability during prior examinations. The claims are pending further adjudication.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the previous VA examinations were inadequate and ordered a new examination with a retrospective medical opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- right elbow flexion contracture, limitation of pronation and supination for right elbow flexion contracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 12, 2021
- Citation
- 21028784
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21028784.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including verifying specific dates of active duty, ACDUTRA, and INACDUTRA, obtaining VA medical examination in conjunction with the claim, and providing a supplemental medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's right elbow conditions.
- Denied
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome as secondary to a service-connected right elbow flexion contracture, finding no evidence linking the carpal tunnel syndrome to his service-connected condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.