Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The issue of entitlement to service connection for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy is dismissed without prejudice.,The issues of entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent disabling for the period prior to April 4, 2017, and in excess of 40 percent disabling for the period thereafter, for service-connected residuals of low back injury with compression fracture of T11 and mild degenerative changes; entitlement to a total disability rating based upon individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities (TDIU) for the period prior to June 1, 2011 are remanded.,The issues of entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea, migraines, sinusitis, GERD, and bilateral athlete's foot are remanded.,,,,,

The deciding factor: The Veteran requested withdrawal of the appeal for the issue of entitlement to service connection for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal.,Remand is needed due to additional development required, including obtaining relevant records from SSA and VA, scheduling a new VA examination for the back disability, and clarifying the diagnosis of the claimed foot disability.,Remand is needed due to additional development required, including obtaining relevant records from SSA and VA, scheduling a new VA examination for the back disability, and clarifying the diagnosis of the claimed foot disability.,,,,,

Claimed conditions
bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy, bilateral flat feet, service-connected residuals of low back injury with compression fracture of T11 and mild degenerative changes, sleep apnea, migraines, sinusitis, GERD, athlete's foot
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 20, 2021
Citation
21031093

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21031093.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.