The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to inadequate VA examinations.,The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to inadequate VA examinations.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension is being remanded as the VA examinations were insufficient in addressing his contentions regarding secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for atrial fibrillation is being remanded as the VA examinations were insufficient in addressing his contentions regarding secondary service connection and herbicide exposure.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for GERD is being remanded as the VA examinations were insufficient in addressing his contentions regarding secondary service connection.
The deciding factor: VA examinations did not adequately assess the Veteran's conditions due to lack of testing on passive motion, weight-bearing/non-weight-bearing conditions.,VA examinations did not adequately assess the Veteran's conditions due to lack of testing on passive motion, weight-bearing/non-weight-bearing conditions.,VA examinations were insufficient in addressing secondary service connection and herbicide exposure.,VA examinations were insufficient in addressing secondary service connection and herbicide exposure.,VA examinations were insufficient in addressing secondary service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, Residuals of a fracture to the distal end of the right tibia and fibula with traumatic arthritis, Hypertension, Atrial fibrillation, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 24, 2021
- Citation
- 21031771
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21031771.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for Dupuytren's contracture of the left hand, right hand, and GERD is remanded due to inadequate VA examination opinions and failure to consider toxic exposure risk activities during service.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.