Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's nasal fracture is not rated as compensable, and the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for her bilateral eye disorder or bladder/urinary disorder.,Service connection was denied for the Veteran's bilateral eye disorder due to lack of a nexus between current eye conditions and in-service events or any related service-connected disabilities. The Veteran's current eye disorders are attributed to pinguecula, keratoconus, and conjunctivitis, none of which are considered service-connected.,Service connection was denied for the Veteran's bladder/urinary disorder as there is no evidence of a chronic disability that began during or was aggravated by service. The Veteran has had multiple examinations concluding her current urinary issues do not have their onset in service.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not establish that the Veteran's nasal fracture resulted in 50 percent obstruction on both sides, which is required for a compensable rating under diagnostic code 6502.,There is no established link between the Veteran's current eye conditions (pinguecula and keratoconus) and her service or any related service-connected disabilities. The VA examiner concluded that these conditions are not caused by conjunctivitis, which occurred in-service.,The evidence does not show a chronic bladder/urinary disorder that began during service or was aggravated by any service-connected disability. Multiple examinations have found no current urinary tract disorders.

Claimed conditions
Nasal Fracture, Bilateral Eye Disorder, Bladder/Urinary Disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
May 25, 2021
Citation
21031960

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21031960.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.