The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate rationale in a previous opinion, and another opinion is needed to determine if squamous cell cancer of the throat is related to service, including herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on an inadequate rationale provided by a medical examiner who relied solely on NAS Updates without providing a full explanation for their opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- squamous cell cancer of the throat
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 26, 2021
- Citation
- 21032304
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21032304.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for additional development to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error related to an inadequate VA opinion regarding the Veteran's squamous cell cancer of the throat.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for squamous cell cancer of the throat, finding that there was no evidence linking it to service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for squamous cell cancer of the throat, finding no evidence linking it to his military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for squamous cell cancer of the throat based on in-service exposure to herbicides. The claim is remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding a link between Agent Orange exposure and the development of squamous cell carcinoma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.