The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for nasal septum spur and non-allergic rhinitis due to insufficient medical opinions in the September 2019 VA examination report.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the Board erred by relying on the September 2019 VA examination report, which did not provide a reasoned medical explanation regarding the relationship between the Veteran's deviated septum and service.
- Claimed conditions
- nasal septum spur, non-allergic rhinitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 9, 2021
- Citation
- 21041428
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21041428.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals regarding service connection for sinus/nasal issues and an increased rating for non-allergic rhinitis due to the Veteran's withdrawal of the appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic sinusitis, non-allergic rhinitis, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and bilateral temporomandibular disorder have been granted. The Board has also remanded the Veteran's claims for left and right Achilles tendonitis, left and right PTTD, and left and right plantar fasciitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for non-allergic rhinitis is denied. The Board has also remanded the issue of service connection for insomnia, as there was insufficient evidence to determine if it was caused or aggravated by his service-connected rhinitis.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial claim for non-allergic rhinitis was denied, and the claims for chronic sinusitis and a bilateral foot condition (claimed as fallen arches) were remanded due to inadequate medical opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.