The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for further development due to inconsistencies in previous opinions and the need for additional evidence. The case will be reconsidered after all necessary steps are taken.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for a new opinion regarding the etiology of the right testicle disability, as previous opinions were based on inaccurate factual premises or insufficient medical records.
- Claimed conditions
- right testicle disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 8, 2021
- Citation
- 21062630
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,249 · Granted: 37% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21062630.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The request to readjudicate the left knee and right testicle disability claims is granted, but the low back disability claim remains denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of erectile dysfunction and right testicle disability for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and an opinion on whether these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues due to additional VA records being added to the file. The Veteran wishes for these records to be reviewed by the AOJ before further consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to incomplete records and requests for further development. The Veteran's right testicle disability is at the center of all these issues, which are now being reviewed again.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.