Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Board has ordered a remand to obtain an addendum opinion from the examiner who conducted the July 2021 VA examination. The examiner is asked to address whether the Veteran's benign heart murmur was a disease or defect, if it was aggravated by her active duty service, and if any superimposed disabilities were due to the heart murmur. Additionally, the examiner must provide opinions on direct service connection for all diagnosed heart disorders, as well as whether any heart disorder was caused or aggravated by her service-connected PTSD.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the June 2021 VA examination and associated medical opinions were inadequate due to incomplete responses to the requested questions and conflicting conclusions from different examiners. The examiner is asked to provide more detailed opinions on these issues in order to properly adjudicate the claim of service connection for a heart disability.

Claimed conditions
atriial fibrillation, cardiomegaly
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 13, 2021
Citation
21063141

Veterans Law Judge

Eric S. Leboff

Decisions by this judge: 2,500 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21063141.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.