Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that an additional remand is necessary to satisfy VA's duty to assist and obtain the May 2011 Goldmann charts, as well as to provide a new addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's bilateral ocular myasthenia and diplopia.

The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to insufficient development of the record and lack of adequate interpretation of the May 2011 VA examination report.

Claimed conditions
bilateral ocular myasthenia, diplopia
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 15, 2021
Citation
21063661

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21063661.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.