The Veteran's bilateral knee disabilities are currently rated at 10 percent each, but the evidence does not support a higher rating. The Board has remanded the case for further development.
The deciding factor: The Veteran’s range of motion did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under DC 5260 or any other applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Knee Patellofemoral Dysfunction, Right Knee Patellofemoral Dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 26, 2021
- Citation
- 21065425
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21065425.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence and failure to notify the Veteran of the decision, requiring a new determination on eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
- Denied
The Veteran's right knee disability was rated at 30% effective July 13, 2012. The Board denied a higher rating based on the severity of symptoms and impairment during this period.
- Granted
The Veteran's appeal was granted, and he is now receiving a 50 percent disability rating for his acquired psychiatric disorder to include PTSD. He also received separate 10 percent ratings for right and left knee patellofemoral dysfunction. The Board has found that the Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities, including his acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.