Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a low back disability is being remanded due to the need for additional examination and opinion.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for left ankle and right ankle disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional examination and opinion.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities are being remanded due to the need for additional examination and opinion.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disability is being remanded due to the need for additional examination and opinion.

The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has a current low back disability that is related to his active service, including an evaluation of abnormal spine upon separation from active service.,Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has a current left or right ankle disability that is related to his active service. The VA examiner did not address the Veteran's and his spouse's reports of continuous low back pain since separation from active service.,Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has a current peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities that is related to his active service, including presumed exposure to herbicide agents. The VA examiner did not provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's current disabilities are directly related to his active service.,Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran has a current heart disability that is related to his active service, including presumed exposure to herbicide agents.

Claimed conditions
low back disability, left ankle disability, right ankle disability, peripheral neuropathy of left upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy of right upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy of left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of right lower extremity, heart disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 28, 2021
Citation
21066117

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21066117.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.