The Veteran's claim for service connection for a urinary disorder, including recurrent urinary tract infections, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatitis, was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of direct service connection due to lack of onset in service or causation by Agent Orange exposure. The Veteran's claim for SMC based on need for aid and attendance was also denied as he does not meet the criteria for regular aid and attendance needs.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that there is no evidence linking the Veteran's current urinary condition to his military service, including Agent Orange exposure, or to any of his service-connected disabilities. The Veteran's need for personal assistance from others was also found to be minimal based on medical evaluations indicating he can feed himself and manage most daily activities.
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent urinary tract infections, benign prostatic hypertrophy, prostatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 1, 2021
- Citation
- 21066636
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21066636.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The appeal seeking to establish entitlement to a TDIU prior to July 30, 2019 and basic eligibility for DEA under 38 USC chapter 35 is dismissed as the pending Legacy system appeal fully encompasses and exceeds the scope of this AMA version of the issues.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service connection claims for various conditions, including adjustment disorder, benign skin lesions, actinic keratosis, poikiloderma, porokeratosis, Parkinson's disease, benign prostatic hypertrophy, hypertension, increased urinary frequency, diverticulosis, duodenal ulcer, and bilateral cataracts are all granted due to exposure to herbicide agents, mustard gas, and ionizing radiation during service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claim of service connection for hyperlipidemia. Service connection is granted for cervical strain, prostatitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including as secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for prostate cancer and prostatitis due to potential exposure at Fort Dix and Schofield Barracks. The AOJ must consider these contentions and provide proper notice and assistance.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.