Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's cardiovascular disorder is presumed to be due to herbicide agent exposure during service, and his left eye disability is found to be secondary to his service-connected cardiovascular disorder. Both claims are granted.

The deciding factor: The VA addendum opinions supported the presumption of herbicide exposure for the cardiovascular disorder and established a known correlation between ischemic heart disease and retinal artery occlusion for the left eye disability.

Claimed conditions
cardiovascular disorder, left eye disability
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
November 1, 2021
Citation
21066651

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21066651.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.