Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for post-operative left hydrocele with bilateral varicocele was denied.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for bilateral varicocele was denied. The earliest date that it is factually ascertainable that the Veteran had a bilateral varicocele disability related to his service-connected left inguinal hernia repair was October 20, 2010.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ was denied. The earliest date entitlement arose is October 20, 2010.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing atrophy of both testicles or chronic epididymo-orchitis/UTIs with long-term drug therapy, hospitalizations, or intensive management related to the post-operative hydrocele/varicocele.,The earliest date that it is factually ascertainable that the Veteran had a bilateral varicocele disability related to his service-connected left inguinal hernia repair was October 20, 2010. The October 2010 VA examination identified a diagnosis of bilateral varicocele secondary to the service-connected left inguinal hernia.,The earliest date entitlement arose for SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ is October 20, 2010. The Veteran was diagnosed with erectile dysfunction (ED) and prescribed oral medication for the condition.

Claimed conditions
Post-operative left hydrocele with bilateral varicocele
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
November 1, 2021
Citation
21066707

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21066707.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.