The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to outstanding VA medical treatment records from prior to September 2009. The effective dates of awards are also being reconsidered.
The deciding factor: Additional VA medical treatment records are needed to determine the precise date in 2000 when the Veteran's conditions began, which will affect the effective dates of the disability ratings and SMC awards.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of left eye vision
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 3, 2021
- Citation
- 21066980
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21066980.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeals to reopen claims for residuals of head trauma consisting of left side facial numbness and loss of left eye vision were denied. The appeal for a compensable rating for left ear hearing loss was also denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for loss of left eye vision was denied as his current visual acuity does not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Partly granted
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, an astrocytoma, and bowel and bladder incontinence. The claim of service connection for left eye vision is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.