The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a removal of his right testicle, finding that it was a congenital defect pre-existing in service and not aggravated by military service.
The deciding factor: The VA specialist examiner found no evidence of permanent aggravation elicited from the Veteran's military exercise for his pre-existing right testicular atrophy (and related pain) induced by surgery for congenital undescended testicle beyond normal progression.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Testicle Condition
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2021
- Citation
- 21067697
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21067697.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA Regional Office (RO) did not complete all requested development for the Veteran's claims of service connection for removal of right testicle and gastrointestinal disability other than GERD to include gastritis. The case is being remanded to address these issues.
- Denied
The Board finds that the Veteran's preexisting right testicle condition was not aggravated by his military service and that his post-service surgery is not related to his military service.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.