The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for her bilateral knee and foot disabilities due to non-compliance with previous remand directives.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was insufficient compliance with previous remand directives regarding the evaluation of the Veteran's bilateral knee and foot disabilities, necessitating further development.
- Claimed conditions
- left femoral condyle, grade II, stress fracture, left medial tibial plateau, grade I, tibial stress changes with chondromalacia (left), right femoral condyle, grade II, stress fracture, right medial tibial plateau, grade III, tibial stress changes with chondromalacia (right)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 22, 2021
- Citation
- 21070079
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21070079.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has not fully addressed whether the Veteran's stress fractures of her knees and feet should be rated as four separate disabilities rather than two, nor whether she is entitled to separate compensable ratings for other foot disabilities. The case is being remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for her bilateral knee and foot disabilities due to errors in how they were rated, including a failure to consider whether she should be rated as having four separate disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.