The Board denied the reopening of a claim for service connection for shrapnel wounds because new evidence did not establish a current diagnosis related to service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found no scars attributable to shrapnel injuries and determined there was no nexus between service and the Veteran's complaints.
- Claimed conditions
- shrapnel wounds
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 25, 2021
- Citation
- 21070744
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21070744.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for shrapnel wounds due to new and material evidence. The issue of service connection for hypertension is remanded as there is insufficient information on whether it is related to herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for shrapnel wounds and unspecified skin condition on bilateral lower extremities due to lack of current diagnosis or manifestations. The case is remanded for further development, including an addendum opinion from a VA examiner.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have not rendered him unemployable or unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation for the period on appeal prior to June 1, 2009.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to determine if the appellant's character of discharge constitutes a bar to VA benefits under Chapter 38 of the US Code. The case is REMANDED for the following actions: obtaining all service treatment records, including a March 1969 neuropsychiatric evaluation; and reviewing the evidence to determine whether the appellant's character of discharge constitutes a bar to receipt of VA benefits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.