The Veteran's claim for residual muscle damage secondary to her total abdominal hysterectomy is being remanded.,The Veteran's claim for depressive disorder with anxiety as secondary to her total abdominal hysterectomy is granted.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not satisfactorily prove or disprove the presence of residual muscle damage related to the total abdominal hysterectomy, necessitating further examination and opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Depressive Disorder with Anxiety
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 6, 2021
- Citation
- 21072717
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21072717.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for PTSD, total abdominal hysterectomy, mechanical small bowel obstruction (volvulus) with necrosis status post appendectomy, anemia, and appendectomy scar. However, the Veteran was granted an effective date of December 14, 2009, for the grant of individual unemployability and eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance.
- Remanded (sent back)
This decision dismisses the Veteran's appeal for an increased disability rating for Pseudofolliculitis Barbae. The Veteran's tinnitus and headaches are granted service connection, but his left ear hearing loss, depressive disorder with anxiety, cervical spine disability, lumbar spine disability, and scar on the head remain remanded for further development.,Service connection is granted for tinnitus due to in-service noise exposure. Headaches are also granted as related to an in-service fall.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed all claims for earlier effective dates and increased disability ratings, as the appellant withdrew his appeals.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for SMC at the housebound rate based on CUE in October 2003 rating decision, finding that the RO did not have a duty to determine whether TDIU was warranted based solely on a single service-connected disability as the first part of an SMC analysis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.