The Veteran's claim for service connection for non-malignant thyroid nodular disease as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation has been remanded due to the need for further development and consideration.
The deciding factor: Further development is required to determine if the Veteran's current condition was caused by his exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Non-malignant thyroid nodular disease
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- Ionizing radiation
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 10, 2021
- Citation
- 21073787
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21073787.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has restored service connection for non-malignant thyroid nodular disease as it is secondary to the Veteran's service-connected euthyroid goiter.
- Denied
The Board found that non-malignant thyroid nodular disease was not incurred in or aggravated by service and may not be presumed to have been incurred in service as a chronic disease or as a disease subject to the presumption of service connection due to radiation-risk activity.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for non-malignant thyroid nodular disease and parathyroid adenoma, finding that the diseases did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Denied
The veteran's non-malignant thyroid nodular disease, malignant melanoma of the left eye, and bilateral posterior subcapsular cataracts were not incurred in or aggravated by military service, nor may they be presumed to have been incurred therein.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.