The Veteran's renal calculi of the kidneys is being remanded for further examination and opinion as the previous VA examiner did not provide a sufficient rationale in their initial opinion.
The deciding factor: The previous VA examiner's opinion was inadequate due to insufficient discussion of both presumptive service connection and direct service connection, and lack of an adequate rationale.
- Claimed conditions
- renal calculi of the kidneys
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 16, 2021
- Citation
- 21074733
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21074733.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of renal calculi of the kidneys, finding that there is no evidence to support a nexus between his current condition and any incident of active service, including herbicide exposure. The Board concluded that the kidney stones did not have onset during service or within one year of separation from service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issue of service connection for renal calculi of the kidneys due to exposure to herbicides while serving at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base in Thailand. The Veteran's specific contentions regarding his duties and potential exposure need further investigation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for skin cancer, type II diabetes mellitus, and renal calculi of the kidneys were denied. The case is remanded due to procedural errors in the rating decisions.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.