The Veteran's service aboard the U.S.S. William H. Standley is considered to be within Vietnam waters, and he has been granted presumptive service connection for transient ischemic attacks due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents. However, further development is needed as the Veteran has not been examined for his current symptoms of transient ischemic attacks or his bilateral hearing loss.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service aboard the U.S.S. William H. Standley was within Vietnam waters and he has been granted presumptive service connection for transient ischemic attacks due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents, but further examination is needed as he has not provided current evidence of his symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- transient ischemic attacks
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 16, 2021
- Citation
- 21074957
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21074957.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on all listed conditions has been dismissed due to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's stroke in February 2016 is found to be less likely related to his service-connected bilateral hearing loss. The Board has ordered a remand for an addendum opinion to address the lay statements of record regarding stress at work due to hearing loss.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for cerebrovascular disease, including as due to herbicide agent exposure or as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II, is remanded. The Board notes the duty-to-assist error in not considering VA treatment records and requires a new opinion on whether the Veteran's stroke residuals are related to herbicide agents or any other toxic exposure risk activity (TERA).
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for thrombosis, transient ischemic attacks, and cerebral infarction (claimed as stroke) is dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.