Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection have been remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions.,The Veteran's hypertension is being reviewed as secondary to his major depressive disorder. The Board also needs an opinion regarding whether it is related to any medications prescribed for his service-connected conditions.,The Veteran's GERD and Barrett's esophagus are being reviewed as secondary to his major depressive disorder, but the need for a medical opinion on the relationship between these conditions and any medications prescribed for his service-connected disabilities remains unclear.,The Veteran's cold injury residuals of the right hand and left hand are still under review with a focus on whether they should be rated higher than 30 percent.,The Veteran's cold injury residuals of the right hand and left hand are still under review with a focus on whether they should be rated higher than 30 percent.

The deciding factor: The Court found that the ratings assigned did not consider the Veteran's symptoms of weakness and changes in skin thickness related to his cold injuries.,The need for an opinion regarding whether hypertension is secondary to any medications prescribed for his service-connected conditions remains unclear.,The need for a medical opinion on the relationship between GERD and Barrett's esophagus with any medications prescribed for his service-connected disabilities remains unclear.,The need for an opinion regarding whether cold injury residuals of the right hand should be rated higher than 30 percent remains unclear.,The need for an opinion regarding whether cold injury residuals of the left hand should be rated higher than 30 percent remains unclear.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, Cold injury to the right hand, Cold injury to the left hand
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 20, 2021
Citation
21075298

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21075298.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.