The Board has determined that additional development is needed to clarify the relationship between the Veteran's anosmia and ageusia, which are claimed to be caused by VA-prescribed simvastatin. The case will be remanded for further medical clarification.
The deciding factor: The examiner's opinion was unclear regarding when the Veteran developed anosmia and ageusia, and did not address relevant medical articles submitted by the Veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- anosmia, ageusia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 21, 2021
- Citation
- 21075713
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21075713.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's tinnitus had onset during active duty service and is granted. The claims for TBI, migraines as secondary to TBI, an eye disability as secondary to TBI, anosmia as secondary to TBI, loss of sense of taste as secondary to TBI, athlete's foot, ingrown toenails, foot pain, joint pain, low back disability, and acne are remanded due to the need for additional examinations.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for initial compensable ratings for anosmia and allergic rhinitis has been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating prior to October 15, 2024, or in excess of 10 percent thereafter.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on multiple conditions was dismissed due to the appellant not being a valid substitute and lacking standing.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for anosmia, finding that it is secondary to the Veteran's service-connected chronic sinusitis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.