The Board has decided to remand the case for a VA examination and medical opinion to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's current skin disorders, including her palmar rash. The examiner will consider all diagnoses present during the appeal period since 1997 and assess whether each condition is at least as likely as not related to service or in-service chemical exposure.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that a remand is necessary due to the need for further medical evaluation and opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's current skin disorders, including her palmar rash.
- Claimed conditions
- Palmar rash, Tinea infection (left hand), Allergic rashes, Impetigo, Contact dermatitis (left palm), Eczema (bilateral palms)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 21, 2021
- Citation
- 21075939
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21075939.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted an initial 10 percent evaluation for impetigo, finding that the Veteran's condition affects less than 20 percent of his exposed areas but not more than 5 percent. The rating is effective as of the date of the decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a new examination to determine the current severity of the Veteran's impetigo, which was previously denied due to insufficient evidence. The Veteran claimed that his impetigo affected areas including the bottom of his lip, chin, and sides of his chin.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.