The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral total hip replacement and TDIU, finding that there was no evidence to support a claim of secondary service connection due to medications. The Board also found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities alone.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the bilateral hip replacements were not caused by any medication and noted that the Veteran had no history of aggravation or worsening of a pre-existing condition due to service-connected disabilities. The Veteran's other service-connected conditions did not prevent him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral total hip replacement
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2021
- Citation
- 21076719
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21076719.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that there was not substantial compliance with the October 2014 remand directives and thus requires another remand for further development of the Veteran's records, including obtaining private treatment records and a VA examination to address whether any current hip disorder is related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service treatment records and requests for additional development, including obtaining medical records from Dr. Henry and First Baptist Hospital.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.