Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's service connection claim for sleep apnea is denied as there was no in-service respiratory injury or disease, and the current condition is not causally related to service.,Service connection is granted for tinnitus as it manifested during service and has been continuously present since then. The Board finds that the Veteran's lay account of chronic tinnitus symptoms during service and continuous post-service symptoms are credible.,The Veteran's claim for other specified trauma and stressor-related disorder is granted based on his reported in-service exposure to weapons fire, which he contends caused his current condition. Service connection is also granted for major depressive disorder as the evidence does not support a link between this condition and service.,Service connection for major depressive disorder is denied due to lack of evidence linking it to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have sleep apnea during service, and there was no causal relationship established between his current condition and service. The Board found the Veteran's account of symptoms during service and post-service to be credible.,Tinnitus was diagnosed after service separation, but the Veteran reported continuous symptoms since service. The VA medical opinion supported this finding by linking tinnitus to in-service noise exposure.,The Veteran's stressor event of witnessing weapons fire is consistent with his service record and fear of hostile military activity. The VA examiner linked the current diagnosis of other specified trauma and stressor-related disorder to the in-service stressor, resolving reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.,Major depressive disorder was not found to be related to service due to lack of evidence linking it to service events or conditions.

Claimed conditions
sleep apnea, tinnitus, other specified trauma and stressor related disorder, major depressive disorder
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Gulf War
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 28, 2021
Citation
21077119

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21077119.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.