Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Board denied service connection for bilateral foot disabilities, including pes planus, as the Veteran's preexisting pes planus did not increase in severity during his period of active duty from July 1978 to February 1980. The Board also granted a TDIU based on service-connected disability.,The Board remanded the issue of service connection for erectile dysfunction secondary to service-connected disease or injury, but no decision was made.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's pes planus preexisted his period of active duty and was not aggravated by this period. The Board found that there is clear and unmistakable evidence that the Veteran's pes planus did not increase in severity during service.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction secondary to service-connected disease or injury remains pending.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Pes Planus, Hallux Valgus, Hallux Rigidus, Arthritis
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
January 3, 2022
Citation
22000067

Veterans Law Judge

H. N. SCHWARTZ

Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22000067.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.