The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's hand condition, specifically whether it is related to service and presumed exposure to herbicide agents at Camp Lejeune.
The deciding factor: Insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hand disorder, particularly concerning its relationship to service and presumed exposure to herbicide agents at Camp Lejeune.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hand disorder
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Camp Lejeune water
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 4, 2022
- Citation
- 22000227
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,199 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22000227.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeals for service connection for various conditions were dismissed due to the Veteran's untimely and improper submission of a VA Form 10182.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an increased rating for sarcoidosis but granted service connection for a left eye disorder, including glaucoma and a bilateral hand disorder as secondary to sarcoidosis.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a bilateral hand disorder and right ankle disorder, both diagnosed as crystalline arthropathy. The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, type II, but granted a 30 percent rating for diabetic nephropathy. Other claims were either denied or granted ratings within the range requested.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for cervical spine disability, concussion, bilateral hand disorder, and bilateral foot pain.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.