The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for basal cell carcinoma of the back, chest, and face, neck, and ears due to insufficient evidence on file.
The deciding factor: There is an indication that basal cell carcinoma could be related to in-service sunlight exposure but there is insufficient evidence of record by which the Board can make a decision.
- Claimed conditions
- basal cell carcinoma of the back, basal cell carcinoma of the chest, basal cell carcinoma of the face, neck, and ears
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 4, 2022
- Citation
- 22000331
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,217 · Granted: 46% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22000331.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's request for an earlier effective date for service connection of basal cell carcinoma on various parts of the body.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus has been denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current disability and there was no evidence of in-service noise exposure or continuity of symptomatology.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for basal cell carcinoma of the back, peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity, and left lower extremity are remanded due to insufficient development. The AOJ is instructed to obtain the credentials of the VA examiners who conducted the October 2023 examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and to obtain a new opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss.,The February 2023 VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's hearing loss is not related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents. The remaining claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, sinus disorder, basal cell carcinoma of the back, diabetes mellitus type II, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy are remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the hypertension claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.