The Board remands the case for further development, including adjudicating secondary service connection claims and obtaining a new VA examination.
The deciding factor: Remand is required due to unadjudicated secondary service connection claims and an inadequate VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of right ankle injury
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2022
- Citation
- 22000751
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for residuals of right and left ankle injuries, finding that moderate limitation of motion was shown but not marked limitation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's appeal for an increased rating of a right ankle injury because the veteran was not afforded a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the Regional Office despite repeatedly requesting one. The veteran is entitled to a hearing and opportunity to submit additional evidence and argument before the merits are decided.
- Denied
The Board denied an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for service-connected right ankle disability based on the current level of symptomatology.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.