The Board remands the matter for further development, including obtaining additional medical evidence and scheduling a new VA examination.
The deciding factor: The existing evidence is inadequate to determine whether there was an additional disability due to VA treatment that was not reasonably foreseeable or due to negligence on the part of VA.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a hysterectomy
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2022
- Citation
- 22000908
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a hysterectomy, resolving reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor.
- Partly granted
The Board denied a compensable disability rating for trichomoniasis and remanded the issue of service connection for residuals of a hysterectomy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a hysterectomy to obtain an addendum opinion regarding its relation to active duty service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the case for further development to determine if the veteran's uterine prolapse and residuals of a hysterectomy are related to her military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.