The Veteran's claims for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus, and effective dates earlier than September 5, 2013, for the grants of service connection for right knee tendinitis and left knee tendinitis have been dismissed.,The Veteran's claim for a new and material evidence to reopen his claims of entitlement to service connection for an eye disability has been granted. The claim for a new and material evidence to reopen his claims of entitlement to service connection for a headache disorder has also been granted.,Service connection is granted for a headache disorder, with the low back disability secondary to bilateral knee tendinitis being in equipoise.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal on these issues prior to the Board's decision.,New and material evidence was received that relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claims of service connection for an eye disability and a headache disorder, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating those claims.,Service connection is granted as the evidence is in equipoise regarding whether the Veteran's headaches are related to active service and if his low back disability was caused by his bilateral knee tendinitis.
- Claimed conditions
- tinnitus, right knee tendinitis, left knee tendinitis, eye disability, headache disorder, low back disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2022
- Citation
- 22001154
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,272 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22001154.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, arthritis, and memory loss. The decision found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus, finding that it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran experienced tinnitus during his active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.