Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to inadequate examinations and incomplete medical histories.,The Veteran's bilateral eye disability claim is remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with his brain tumor claim.,The Veteran's residuals of vaccines claim is remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion regarding malaria vaccine residuals.,The Veteran's gastrointestinal disorder claim is remanded due to incomplete medical history consideration.,The Veteran's brain tumor claim is remanded as it requires a supplemental opinion considering medical literature submitted by the Veteran.,The Veteran's memory loss claim is remanded due to incomplete medical history consideration and lack of discussion regarding his seizure disorder.,The Veteran's headache disorder claim is remanded due to incomplete medical history consideration.

The deciding factor: Examiners did not obtain complete histories from the Veteran, which are necessary for proper evaluation of service connection claims.,Issues are inextricably intertwined and must be decided together as they involve overlapping symptoms.,Residuals claim requires an addendum opinion considering malaria vaccine residuals based on incomplete medical history.,Gastrointestinal disorder claim requires a supplemental opinion considering the Veteran's long history of gastric reflux since service.,Brain tumor claim requires a supplemental opinion considering medical literature submitted by the Veteran and his seizure disorder.,Memory loss claim requires a supplemental opinion considering the Veteran's subjective complaints and lack of discussion regarding his seizure disorder.,Headache disorder claim requires a supplemental opinion considering the Veteran's long history of headaches since service.

Claimed conditions
undiagnosed illness or medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness (MUCMI), bilateral eye disability, residuals of vaccines, to include malaria, gastrointestinal disorder, brain tumor, memory loss, headache disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 11, 2022
Citation
22001328

Veterans Law Judge

S. A. Prinsen

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22001328.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.