Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The effective date for Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and scars associated with it remains at March 14, 2017.,The Veteran's bilateral ankle disability and left knee disability are remanded due to the need for VA examinations.,The Veteran's bilateral pes planus is remanded as there needs to be a new opinion regarding whether his condition worsened during service.

The deciding factor: Service connection for tinnitus was granted based on continuity of symptoms since service. The effective date for Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and scars associated with it remains at March 14, 2017 due to the retroactivity of the regulation.,The Veteran's bilateral ankle disability and left knee disability need VA examinations as there are no current medical opinions regarding their etiology. The Veteran's bilateral pes planus needs a new opinion on whether its worsening during service was clear and unmistakable.,Bilateral pes planus is presumed to be related to service due to the Veteran's history of it at enlistment, but further examination is needed to determine if it worsened in service.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, bilateral ankle disability, left knee disability, bilateral pes planus
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 13, 2022
Citation
22001898

Veterans Law Judge

Jennifer White

Decisions by this judge: 1,185 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22001898.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.