The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right and left knee disabilities have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support higher ratings based on functional loss due to pain or other factors, as well as lack of ankylosis, recurrent subluxation, or lateral instability.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's knee conditions were rated under Diagnostic Codes for limitation of motion and prosthetic replacements. The Board found that the evidence did not support higher ratings based on functional loss due to pain or other factors, as well as lack of ankylosis, recurrent subluxation, or lateral instability.
- Claimed conditions
- Knee joint osteoarthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 20, 2022
- Citation
- 22002950
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22002950.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for an increased rating for his right knee strain and TDIU due to service-connected disabilities require additional development. Specifically, a VA examination is needed to assess the current severity of the Veteran's right knee disability during the entire period on appeal.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the death of the appellant, and no service connection issues were addressed.
- Denied
The Veteran's right knee disability, including a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis, is currently rated at 10 percent. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating due to lack of limitation in flexion or extension.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.