The Board has found that the Veteran's monoclonal gammopathy and/or MGUS condition may be related to his in-country service in Vietnam, presumed exposure to herbicide agents. However, further development is needed as there are insufficient medical opinions on record.
The deciding factor: There are no sufficient medical opinions linking the Veteran's monoclonal gammopathy and/or MGUS to his military service or herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- IgA monoclonal gammopathy, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 27, 2022
- Citation
- 22004379
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22004379.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic kidney disease (CKD) with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is denied as the earliest effective date possible is August 2, 2024. The PACT Act did not establish CKD as a presumptive disease relating to herbicide agent exposure and MGUS was diagnosed after the liberalizing law.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal is dismissed because the December 2025 VA Form 10182, Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement), was docketed in error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that remand is necessary for the Veteran's claims of service connection for hypertension and MGUS due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the relationship between these conditions and his military service, specifically exposure to tear gas during active duty.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the onset and causation of his conditions, particularly diabetic peripheral neuropathy in multiple extremities and diabetes mellitus type II.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.