The Board has found that the VA examination of the Veteran's ankle was inadequate and remanded for a new examination. The case is being returned to the AOJ for further development.
The deciding factor: The previous VA examination did not include range of motion testing, which is required by regulations and court decisions.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right fibula fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 2, 2022
- Citation
- 22005625
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22005625.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for residuals of a right fibula fracture, leg length discrepancy secondary to left total knee replacement, and left ankle condition secondary to left total knee replacement due to incomplete examination reports and need for further clarification on etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination findings for assessing the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a right fibula fracture. The Veteran needs an updated VA examination to determine his current disability level.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination of the Veteran's ankle and lower leg, which is necessary for a proper evaluation of his service-connected residuals of a right fibula fracture.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to incomplete records, specifically the February 2020 x-ray results of his right knee. The VA needs to obtain these records and review them with a clinician who can determine if they affect the accuracy of the August 2020 examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.